Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
1
Votes
David Levy
  • Fair Lawn, NJ
1
Votes |
12
Posts

I can do a 20% down, but why not 3.5% FHA? Please Help

David Levy
  • Fair Lawn, NJ
Posted

Hi all,

I've been a "renter" all my life and finally buying a townhouse in state of NJ to live in. 

After reading a lot about putting my money to work and I do have over 130k to work with, I am now thinking if I should avoid doing the 20% down payment (70k) on my new townhouse and instead do the 3.5% FHA loan and use my savings for buying rental properties.

Where I live, I can get a 

Studio for 140k and rent it for about $1,200-1,300

1 Bedroom for $200k and rent it for $1,500-1,600

Bottom line is ... at just 3.7% APR loss, I can put my money into more properties or even places like mutual funds where it may be making me 7%+.

Thoughts? Thank you.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied

MATH TIME MOTHERTRUCKERS.

  • $350k purchase price, going to use California numbers because that's what I know.
  • 20% down conventional v 3.5% down FHA.
  • $70,000 out of pocket v $12,250 out of pocket (let's pretend closing costs are identical, so only the down payment changes).
  • What is the cost of keeping that $57,750 in your pocket? 
  • 20% down: PITI is ballpark $1991.
  • 3.5% down: PITI is ballpark $2442.
  • $451 month difference, to keep $57,750 in your checking account.
  • What does it cost to borrow this extra $57,750?
  • $451 * 12 / $57,750 = 9.37% effective marginal interest rate to borrow that extra money!
  • Keeping that $57,750 in your pocket is mathematically nearly identical (less any applicable tax advantages, among other things) to taking out a second mortgage for $57,750 at 9.37% after putting 20% down.

Are you really going to put that $57,750 to work elsewhere earning you better than 9.37%? 

I don't know the answer to that, only you do, but that's the question before you. And keep in mind that doing 20% down is a guaranteed marginal 9.37% compared to 3.5% down which is a speculative 9.37%.

Does that mean I hate FHA 3.5% down? No, absolutely not! But borrowers that have the option should be aware of the true cost of that money they are keeping in their checking account, so they can make an informed decision. 

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...