Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

44
Posts
6
Votes
Matthew Harrison
  • Property Manager
  • Redford, MI
6
Votes |
44
Posts

buyers agent but no listing agent

Matthew Harrison
  • Property Manager
  • Redford, MI
Posted

I have read and understand the theory of using a buyers agent because the seller pays the cost. So why would you not? However, does this theory remain when the seller does not have a listing agent? I have  a coworker that wants out of his house.  My only "need" for a buyers agent would be to walk me through the steps of closing that I am just starting to get familiar with, and make sure the sale is done properly.  But then how will she get paid? Am I taking money out of my sellers hands? Out of my own hands? 

Loading replies...