Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

29
Posts
5
Votes
Lei Pan
  • Tacoma, WA
5
Votes |
29
Posts

Why investors dump their Milwaukee low end rental properties?

Lei Pan
  • Tacoma, WA
Posted

I have done a lot of studies of listed Milwaukee properties, particularly those listed below $50k.  I am surprised to see a couple of investors are unloading their properties by selling in bundles.  Their properties are still all fully rented out, and with good cash flow in my opinion.

What are the reasons for their unloading?

(1) do they see bad future?

(2) do they have too much hidden costs that make the cash flow much worse than it looks?

(3) Did they find better opportunities elsewhere?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

209
Posts
169
Votes
James R.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
169
Votes |
209
Posts
James R.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
Replied

I think Milwaukee gets a bad rap for being labeled as a "segregated" city.  Milwaukee is very unique in that it is a city of neighborhoods, with each neighborhood holding on to its unique identity due to the people who live there.  I personally like that.  What I don't like is the poverty in the underprivileged neighborhoods, which sometimes can be perpetuated by landlords.  NPR had a report on how the "system" can work against poor people when it comes to evictions.  The landlord buys a pig and doesn't maintain it.  Instead, he/she pockets the cash flow.  When the tenants refuse to pay rent because the landlord is not maintaining the property, the landlord files for eviction.  There are numerous cases where the poor are continually victimized by these true to form "slumlords".  These same landlords are now trying to unload their pigs to out-of-town investors as cash cows.

The City of Milwaukee is 63% non-white.  The problems started when people seeking jobs and a better life (often from Chicago) came to the neighborhoods left behind during white flight.  When the manufacturing jobs evaporated, these new residents were left with no options.  

The Wal-Mart in the Northside of Milwaukee, which is predominately black, just closed due to lack of profits. Many in that neighborhood are now unemployed due to its closure.  When will corporations do something good for a change, instead of putting profits before people?  

@Dawn Anastasi  I believe your success is due to the fact that you self-manage your properties and you also care.  If more landlords were like you, they would be part of the solution to providing decent housing to people in poorer neighborhoods.  Kudos!  

Loading replies...