Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

25
Posts
1
Votes
Kevin R.
  • Philadelphia, PA
1
Votes |
25
Posts

Which inspection findings should I ask the seller to pay for?

Kevin R.
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

Hi everyone. I just had an offer accepted for $230,000 on a 2,550 sqft triplex in Philadelphia which was built in 1925. The inspection turned up the following issues. Which of these do you think I should push to have the buyer cover?

  • The main water line is lead. Per the inspector, lead in the main water line can leach into the drinking water and cause health problems. The inspector recommended a water quality test as well as replacement of the main water line.
  • Severe corrosion was noted in the house main electric panel and at the lug connections in the main panel. Per the inspector, this creates a potential fire hazard. The inspector recommended that a licensed electrician fully evaluate the electric panel and replace the panel as necessary.
  • The 30A circuit at the main panel is run to 20A wire in the junction box above the panel. Per the inspector, this creates a potential fire hazard. Three hot wires share a common neutral wire in the main panel and in the 3rd floor subpanel. Per the inspector, this also creates a potential fire hazard. The inspector recommended that a licensed electrician fully evaluate the electric panels and wiring throughout the building and correct all overfused circuits as necessary.
  • The ground and neutral wires were connected on the same bus bar in both unit 2 subpanels. Per the inspector, this creates a potential shock hazard. The inspector recommended that a licensed electrician evaluate the subpanels and properly separate the ground and neutral wires.
  • Plumbing issues. When the realtor turned the water on the other day, there were various leaks inside and outside the home. The inspector recommended that a licensed plumber evaluate the water lines throughout the house and eliminate all leaks as necessary.
  • Per the inspector, the steam boiler does not appear to have been properly maintained and may not function properly. A significant amount of debris and corrosion were noted in the sight glass and at the low water cutoff. The inspector recommended that a licensed HVAC contractor fully evaluate and replace the heating system (and any damaged radiators) as necessary.
  • Per the inspector, the electrical system does not appear to be properly grounded. One of the ground wires was run to the water supply line, but the main water line run to the house is lead (which is a very poor conductor of electricity). The other ground wire is loose and not connected to a ground source. This creates a potential hazard in the event of a ground fault. The inspector recommended that a licensed electrician correct the electrical ground in the building.
  • The electric service entrance cable is frayed and deteriorating. Per the inspector, this can allow moisture to enter the SE wire and corrode the meter bases and/or the main panels. It also can create a potential shock hazard. The inspector recommended that a licensed electrician replace the SE cable.
  • Severe corrosion and cracking were noted in the cast iron drain piping in the basement. The inspector recommended that a licensed plumber fully evaluate the DWV piping throughout the house and replace the damaged piping as necessary.
  • Per the inspector, the water heater shows signs of severe corrosion and appears to be at the end of its expected life. The inspector recommended that a licensed plumber fully evaluate the water heater and replace the system as necessary.
  • Aluminum siding was used as a roof covering above a bay window. Per the inspector, this is not a proper roof covering. Wet moisture staining was noted on the ceiling below this roof indicating that this roof is currently leaking. The inspector recommended that a licensed roofer replace the bay window roof, eliminate any active leaks, and remove and replace all moisture-damaged building materials as necessary.
  • The brick is bulging and shows signs of movement above the basement exterior door. Per the inspector, the brick is vulnerable to future movement or damage in this location, and he recommended that a licensed bricklayer repoint and repair the damaged and bulging brick as necessary.
  • Severe corrosion was noted at the steam distribution piping next to the boiler. The piping appears to be damaged and may be leaking. The inspector recommended that a licensed HVAC contractor fully evaluate the distribution piping and replace any damaged piping as necessary.
  • A few windows do not stay up on their own. Per the inspector, this creates a potential safety hazard. One window is cracked. Another dual pane window appears to have a failed thermoseal at the middle window. Fog/condensation was observed in this thermopane window. The inspector recommended that a licensed carpenter fully evaluate and correct or replace the defective windowpanes or windows as necessary.
  • Fire alarm system is required by law for multifamily properties, so we need to ensure that it is functional.

Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

65
Posts
26
Votes
Igor Avratiner
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
26
Votes |
65
Posts
Igor Avratiner
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Replied

In that case push as much as you can. The items the inspector described are pretty serious and potentially costly items. Especially if you are not buying as is you have the right and responsibility to your business to find some kind of resolution. Fire alarm system alone is not cheap. If they can fix everything using qualified licensed electrician/plumber and keep the same sales price I would be satisfied. 

Loading replies...