Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago, 02/25/2016

User Stats

20
Posts
3
Votes
Aleko Petkov
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
3
Votes |
20
Posts

Section 8 missed inspection fine

Aleko Petkov
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

We had a Section 8 inspection, but the tenant forgot and wasn't home to let the inspector in. We live in the same building, but the inspector did not make any effort to contact us. Instead they decided to fine us $500! They didn't even tell us, it took weeks of phone calls, and an escalation to a supervisor to get an answer.

It makes no sense to me to fine the landlord for the tenant's failure, especially when no attempt was made to contact the landlord.

I can't find any written documentation that supports this fine. Does anyone know about this? How can I dispute this ludicrous and arbitrary fine?

Loading replies...