Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago,

User Stats

32
Posts
20
Votes
Edward A.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
20
Votes |
32
Posts

"Subject to getting a satisfactory attorney review of offer"

Edward A.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

Is this an effective contingency to have on a purchase agreement offer?

I'd like to get an attorney involved with reviewing all of the documentation pertaining to a purchase agreement, but not until after the seller has accepted. Is this a common contingency used? Can an attorney completely overhaul the offer once they review? Obviously I wouldn't want to make big changes if the seller already accepted, but I'm just wondering what kind of freedom I have here.

Loading replies...