Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Derek Taylor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Chattanooga, TN
1
Votes |
5
Posts

Mortgage Correlation to Net Worth

Derek Taylor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Chattanooga, TN
Posted
​Greetings! I'm a beginner investor and am confused about how mortgages correlate to net worth. If I buy an asset for $200,000 with 20% down, I'm financing $160,000 (aka, the mortgage). My asset is obviously 200k, but do I list my liability as 160k even though that number doesn't include the interest? With 4% interest, my 30 year fixed 160k mortgage is actually a 275k liability. Does this mean I'm negative 75k in the red even with my 20% equity? This doesn't seem practical. Are mortgage liabilities only shown as the principle then so that the asset is above water? Thank you kindly for your wisdom!

Loading replies...