Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

20
Posts
1
Votes
Chris Patrick
  • Houston, TX
1
Votes |
20
Posts

bandos -- demolish, deconstruct, or leave standing

Chris Patrick
  • Houston, TX
Posted

I had a couple questions about abandoned un-salvageable houses on otherwise vacant city lots that I want to buy and hold.  

The plan is to hold the lot for 5-10 years before doing one of three things:  1) sell as is, 2) tear down and sell, or 3) tear down and develop myself.  Factoring in liability insurance with/without a structure, potentially higher taxes with/without a structure, and demolition/deconstruction costs, what is the best financial decision:  tear down (or deconstruct) soon after purchasing, OR leave the structure standing for 5-10 years until I decide what I want to do with the lot?  This would be in Texas, likely Houston or San Antonio.

Loading replies...