Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

68
Posts
25
Votes
Holden Latimer
  • Investor
  • Salt Lake City, UT
25
Votes |
68
Posts

Escalation Clauses

Holden Latimer
  • Investor
  • Salt Lake City, UT
Posted

Was reading this article today and read about something I had never heard of before. Escalation Clauses. Basically the author describes using this strategy when the buyer's agent asks for best and final offers. Rather than blindly raising your offer, the author suggest putting an escalation clause within the offer which basically stipulates that you will beat the highest competing offer by a couple hundred dollars up to a specified price cap. This protects yourself against needlessly raising your offer in situations such as this.

I was wondering if fellow BP faithful have had experience structuring your offers in this way? Thanks!

http://www.heraldextra.com/business/local/utah-cou...

Loading replies...