Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

309
Posts
127
Votes
Leigh Ann Smith
  • Manvel, TX
127
Votes |
309
Posts

Make sale contingent on renter moving out?

Leigh Ann Smith
  • Manvel, TX
Posted

We're looking at a house that has a renter in it who's supposedly paying $1,100/month with a month to month lease.  With a few cosmetic upgrades, the place should easily rent for $1,400.  Based on the pictures online of the house, it looks like the renter has been there a long time (lots of stuff on the walls, etc.) . Properties have been selling super fast, so we'd like to put in a cash offer (possibly full asking price).  

What do you think about putting in a contingency that the renter needs to be out before closing?  And should we throw something in there about requiring an inspection for damages after the move out?  We don't want to make our offer unattractive by adding difficult contingencies, but nobody wants to inherit a tenant who's paying $300 under market rent.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

76
Posts
30
Votes
Michael Modesto
  • Investor
  • Chino, CA
30
Votes |
76
Posts
Michael Modesto
  • Investor
  • Chino, CA
Replied

@Leigh Ann Smith

Building on what @Eric Thomson mentions above, I would put value in a proven tenant who pays on time.  If the tenant leaves, it would take 3+ months' worth of the $300 increase in rent collected to recoup the losses from each month loss in rents due to vacancy.

I would first explore ways to increase the monthly rent, before evicting a (presumably) good tenant.

Also, in a competitive market (as you said), having these conditions may negatively affect the chances of your offer getting accepted.  IMHO.

Loading replies...