Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Andrew Cornell
  • La Canada Flintridge, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

tenant paying above market rent to himself

Andrew Cornell
  • La Canada Flintridge, CA
Posted

I was assisting a family member who was looking to purchase a multi tenant office building as an income property. I noticed monthly rent for one tenant was about 10% higher than the others. Turns out that the owner of the building and the tenant paying the higher rent were two separate LLC's that were registered to the same person. The cap rate in the listing and marketing material was based on rental income that was artificially inflated. The broker also never informed me of this owner tenant relationship either either, I discovered it on my own.

I understand that an LLC is a separate legal entity but in this case the money is going to the same place. Is this sort of thing common? If name alone is not enough to show the relationship between owner and tenant shouldn't that be disclosed right away? To me it seems like a deceptive accounting trick. Is it even legal to not disclose to a buyer that this owner tenant relationship exists?

Loading replies...