Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago, 04/01/2015

User Stats

19
Posts
8
Votes
Matthew G.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
8
Votes |
19
Posts

To rent or sell existing home after purchase of new home in Southern California

Matthew G.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
Posted

I'm sure this question comes up often when people upgrade to a new home but don't need to sell their existing home as a contingency. I'm looking for advice on the following scenario. 

Party decides to buy new home and is contemplating selling or renting existing home. The existing home is worth approx $1,000,000 and has a mortgage balance of $490,000. Mortgage, property tax, insurance, gardener, and pool guy run a total of $3,600/month. The home is turn key having been completely stripped down to the studs and rebuilt 2 years ago. The home is located in a beach community in southern California with higher than average appreciation rates. Based on current amortization schedule the current monthly principle reduction is around $1,100 per month.

The home has some other unique features that are rare in the area such as a private double sized lot. The owner has been told that rents for a home like this could fall into the $3,600-$4,000 per month range living little room for emergency improvements/maintenance etc. Monthly cost for property management company is $150.

For all you buy and hold investors out there would you consider renting a property like this situation knowing that the mortgage is getting paid and where the appreciation trends are at in southern California? I calculated the yearly principle reduction at approx $13,200 which is around 3% of the equity in the property. In researching the average trends for southern California beach communities in the last 20 years I found a 4% annual appreciation on average for the area. 

7% return is not amazingly appealing but I know southern California real estate plays by a whole different set of rules. 

In keeping and renting the property there is also the option of refinancing the loan which will insure cash flow but reset the amortization schedule and of course lengthen the payoff term. 

So what does the community think? Sell or Rent?

Thank you in advance for your investor feedback. 

Loading replies...