Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

19
Posts
3
Votes
Brian Prom
  • Brighton, MI
3
Votes |
19
Posts

Fannie Mae 97% LTV Loan Question

Brian Prom
  • Brighton, MI
Posted

Hey everyone, 

I've got a question about Fannie Mae's new 97% LTV loan for first time homebuyers. I currently own a home in which I just refi'd out of a FHA loan to a 15 year conventional. I'm looking to purchase my first rental home, or move to a new Primary and rent out my current home.

Because of the growing prices in my neighborhood, I'm leaning more towards purchasing a new primary, with the growing family and all, I feel it is the best first move, as in the end I will have my first rental home.

I know that to qualify for this loan at least one of the applicants needs to be a first time homebuyer. I purchased my first home before my wife and I got married, and I was the primary buyer. But now that we are married, and I am refinancing, The state of Michigan requires a non-borrowing spouse to sign paperwork and be listed as a co-owner of the home. Does this constitute as her being a homeowner? Or is she still considered a first time homebuyer because she is not a borrower?

I like the idea of only putting 3% down for a new primary, as that will leave me in a better position to purchase another investment property more quickly.

Thanks!

Loading replies...