Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

136
Posts
76
Votes
Riley F.
  • New York City, NY
76
Votes |
136
Posts

What was it like investing before The Bubble?

Riley F.
  • New York City, NY
Posted

For those of you who have been investing >10 years, and have accrued properties before the 2003 time period, what was it like buying properties before the bubble really started to pick up. The reason is I ask is because it seems when I read any real estate book, the strategy the author advocate seems to be entirely predicated on: 1) The time period the book was written and, 2) The location of the author.

Some books talk about how if you can buy CLOSE to the 1% rule, you should get close to or slightly cash flow positive and be fine. On the other hand, "Investing in Duplexes, Triplexes, and Quads: The Fastest and Safest Way to Real Estate Wealth", written in 2006 by a man in the Florida market advocates buying tons of property with $0 down and says to expect approximately 8% appreciation a year - LUNACY!

So I'd like to hear from some folks on the site. Pre 2003, were you using the 1% rule, able to buy at discounts, buying at auction, MLS combing, REOs, marketing for leads, all of the above? I'm sure the volume of REOs was substantially lower, but what type of discounts were you seeing? Was there less competition for deals or substantially more? Does marketing still work in a normal market, etc?

Would love to hear what these guys have to say:

@Jay Hinrichs , @Darren Sager , @Brian Burke , @Jerry Puckett 

Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

10,252
Posts
16,111
Votes
Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • East Wenatchee, WA
16,111
Votes |
10,252
Posts
Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • East Wenatchee, WA
Replied

In the days before youtube and BP, the returns were there more-so in 2003, but the money and information wasn't as much.  You had to actually qualify for the loan with documentation and a good rate was anything below 7%.  In my area, I was buying 5-bedroom homes for $105k and renting them out for $1150 w/pets. The 5-bed home was the outlier and I made it my niche. These days the same house would be $185k, renting for $1350.  Doesn't work anymore and the lending requirements have tightened again, though the rates are much lower.    I also picked up some multi-families in 2003 that were bank owned in a small town. I still have those today. $25k per unit, renting for $400/unit average with seller (bank portfolio) financing.  This was also before BP and many other investor-friendly educational venues so there were far fewer investors chasing the same deal.  Most thought I was crazy.  Different mentality overall then with much less free info available. 

Loading replies...