Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7905/b79053b24593d0f6f5952e0322d7c601fa88a0ef" alt="Scott Nipp's profile image"
Sub2 questions...
I'm about half way thru listening to podcast 70 on Sub2 financing deals and find it really fascinating. I have a distressed home owner that I was trying to work with a few weeks ago but we couldn't get close on the numbers for a flip or rental. I'm now thinking that a Sub2 deal might be a winning strategy for her situation. However, I have a couple of questions...
1. Anticipating her question: Since the existing mortgage stays in place in her name, what happens in a couple of years if her situation improves and she wants to purchase another house? Would she have a problem obtaining conventional financing for a second home that would be her primary residence?
2. Assuming that I were to close the Sub2 deal and then owner finance to a new occupant, who is responsible for the insurance on the property?
3. If there is significant equity in the deal I understand that I could structure the owner financing to require a significant down payment to "cash out" some of that equity. Is it also a viable strategy to simply recoup that equity on the back end of the loan after the existing financing is paid off? Or is this just simply a bad idea?
I'm sure that I have more questions but I'll start there. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5018b/5018b3a5a704c848455cefda8249cdc0231834ed" alt="Jon Holdman's profile image"
@Scott Nipp you might want to read through the thread about that podcast. There were some pretty serious concerns voiced about that strategy.
One is that if you wrap the existing mortgage and sell with owner financing, you better make dang sure that the balance you owe on the original mortgage is always below what your end buyer owes. That podcast talks about selling with 15 year notes. If you wrap a note with, say, 20 years left to pay with a 15 year note, the end buyer will pay off the loan five years before you do. That means you will need to come out of pocket to pay that off when the end buyer does or else you won't be able to deliver the clear title you've said you would.
You need to be VERY, VERY, VERY clear with the end buyer that there is a very real chance that they will have to refinance quickly in order to keep the house. Just being current on their payments IS NOT adequate to ensure they will be able to keep the house. If they cannot refinance on a moment's notice, they may lose the house even though they have complied with everything they agreed to. Guess who's getting sued if that happens?
Property taxes, insurance and maintenance are the responsibility of the owner. That's the end buyer. Neither you nor the original owner can deduct the property taxes on your tax return, even if these are, in fact, being paid by the underlying lender. These go to the end buyer.
On your tax return (you need an accountant, by the way) you would show income from the payments you receive and deductions for the interest you pay.