Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
5
Votes
Alex D.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Pittsburgh, PA
5
Votes |
15
Posts

selling -- price it high and lower it over time, or price it low and stand firm?

Alex D.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Posted

Hi. I am new at real estate investing and new to BP. I'm looking to sell a SFH in Pittsburgh, PA, that I have held for 5 years.

My question is about setting the asking price for the listing.

Should I set a high asking price and reduce it gradually until I get an offer (or offers), or should I price it right around where I think it should sell for and stand firm?

My assumption is that retail buyers are more informed these days with all the resources available to them, so I feel that they would be unlikely to overpay. Of course, I have no evidence to support this yet. I am looking for advice from the forum. Would I simply be wasting time by listing too high?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4
Posts
1
Votes
Jason Hershey
  • Commercial Landlord
  • Duvall, WA
1
Votes |
4
Posts
Jason Hershey
  • Commercial Landlord
  • Duvall, WA
Replied

I believe you are right that buyers are, in general, more informed. There should be a range of appropriate prices, and being near the top isn't bad, but you don't want to be over-priced. Here is the logic I use when explaining it to my brokerage clients:

Lets say at the time you list the property, there are 1000 people looking, and a new 100 people every day. On day one of the listing you have the opportunity to grab the attention of 1000 people. If your property is priced 'out of the market', you have trouble getting those people back. Instead, with every price change you will get the new days 100 people and perhaps some of the 1000 that were already looking... but probably not all of them. You are at the mercy of their search setup. If they've ruled out your property, it may never show up for them again.

So, you are best making sure you are in the right price range, even if its a little on the high side. If you are on the high-side of the market, make sure there is a reason for it... if you have a completely upgraded, painted, repaired house, then being the highest price/SF might make sense.

Also keep in mind your goals... if it is to turn around the property quickly, you may be better off going on the low end, or below market, just to move the property quickly. Also, I do know some brokers who like to price below market to generate lots of interest and hopefully cause multiple offers and a bidding war. This can work, but I'm never all that comfortable with it, unless I (and the client) are willing to accept the lower initial price, if there are not multiple offers.

Good luck!

-Jason

Loading replies...