Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated 2 days ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0070/a0070e332ae0375ea6d77ee03ba46980f95ca679" alt="Christopher Davis's profile image"
Changing trends in commission structures since the NAR ruling? (Nashville)
Hi, I'm wondering if any agents in Nashville have noticed any actually shifting trends in commission structure since the NAR ruling? Is it having any effect yet in actual deals? Are sellers leaning into offering only 3% for their agent? Are buyers struggling to accept paying their agent as a new structure? I know it's "all negotiable," what everyone says, but I also hear that most of the time it's standard 6% (3+3 paid by seller).
Generally interested in how that ruling may be starting to affect attitudes on the ground or actual commissions in deals. Not fully versed in every nuance of buyer/seller/agent negotiations, but as a future seller I hope to reduce my commission payouts.
Cheers