Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago,

User Stats

9
Posts
6
Votes
Skylar Martinez
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
6
Votes |
9
Posts

Buying a property with tennants paying below average paying rents

Skylar Martinez
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hello BiggerPockets Community,

I found a property that seems like it would cash flow positively ($1600) based on market rents. However, the existing tenants are paying about half of what current rates appear to be, according to my research on Rentometer, Apartments.com, and HotPads. The property is a 6-unit building in Los Angeles.

Given the significant difference in current rents vs. market rates, I'm looking for advice on how to legally and ethically approach raising the rents to reflect market value, should I decide to move forward with the purchase.

Some additional context: even if I were to negotiate a better (reasonable) price and were to successfully evict a tenant who is 5 months behind on their rent and charge the market rent for that unit I'd still be -$600/month. 

What are the best practices in this situation, especially considering any local laws and regulations that might apply? I understand the importance of being a responsible and ethical landlord, so I'm seeking guidance on how to navigate this transition smoothly and fairly.

Thanks in advance for your insights!

Loading replies...