Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

18
Posts
5
Votes
Gursel Demir
  • Sparta, NJ
5
Votes |
18
Posts

Buying a partial interest on an inherited house.

Gursel Demir
  • Sparta, NJ
Posted

A brother and sister inherited a house and are in title as tenants in common. The brother, who lives in the house, wants to sell but the sister, who lives out of state, is refusing.

In the mean time, the back taxes are piling up and the house has become the eyesore of a decent neighborhood.

The brother has had enough and has asked me to purchase his half interest. My exit strategy would be to sue the sister for partition.

Upon purchasing the brothers interest, if I payoff the back taxes, will the sister be responsible for half of those taxes upon partition? They do not have a written agreement as to who pays the taxes, maintenance, etc.

Any other advice from those who buy partial interests?

Thanks

Gursel

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,866
Posts
3,548
Votes
Rick H.#4 Marketing Your Property Contributor
  • Lender
  • Greater LA/Orange County area, CA
3,548
Votes |
3,866
Posts
Rick H.#4 Marketing Your Property Contributor
  • Lender
  • Greater LA/Orange County area, CA
Replied

Hey Gursel - I like the basic idea, even have it in my list of other strategies to employ. In addition to Gulley's, I think the basic points to remember are that:

1) Brother is receiving no benefit of ownership now

2) Sister (resident) isn't paying tax obligation which puts asset in jeopardy

3) Strategy ought to revolve around Sister buying you out for a profit

I think that the message to the Sister is that you are just an investor. Soft ball or hard ball, either are okay with you. She will no doubt initially tense up and be in fear, perhaps masked by anger. If she does not respond, provide a catalyst (attorney letter) but remember partition is expensive, lengthy and messy. Also usually ends up with auction or sale of asset. So, mitigation is the more profitable action to exhaust first.

I think best play involves typing up Brothers share and bulletproofing deal without much of any cash now. Price and terms must give you sufficient margin. Exit plan profit might be that Sister buys you out with a secured note and cash that pays Brother and leaves you a profit or positive cash flow.

Since Sister may not like that idea, she can borrow X to pay you and that's what will pay Brother from.

How you add value is that you are the intermediary between related partners who creates the catalyst for Sister to perform and provide benefits to Brother.

Loading replies...