Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

243
Posts
58
Votes
David Rutledge
  • Irvine, CA
58
Votes |
243
Posts

ARV for ADU project in San Diego

David Rutledge
  • Irvine, CA
Posted

Good afternoon,

I was not sure where to post this question so my apologies if this is in the wrong place.

I am looking at some opportunities to buy an existing duplex or sfr in an RM area with the intention to build an additional duplex.

What I am most concerned about is the ARV value appraising for lower than what it cost us to build. It seems these valuations can be all over the place.

I would like to get some opinions from others who may have done this. Would a duplex that effectively becomes a 4plex receive a favorable valuation or would it be considered an "accessory" and thus not be valued at what we put into it. This is what I am seeing a lot of when combing through some older posts.

Thanks in advance

David

Loading replies...