Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

18
Posts
4
Votes
James Siller
  • Realtor
  • Houston, TX
4
Votes |
18
Posts

Un-annexing property from city limits

James Siller
  • Realtor
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Does anybody have experience with Un-annexing a property from the city limits? What’s the angle? Are their any benefits of the city? I can only see disadvantages from their side, in that they would be losing control and tax money (even though it’s currently ag exempt).

Current situation is the city limit splits the subject property, and the ETJ is the other split. It also happens to have an additional city’s ETJ on 2 of the boundaries.

The city has quite different restrictions on building in the city limits vs outside (ETJ), so it’s advantageous for me to have it all in the ETJ. Note that the city does not provide any utilities to this property and has no plans do to do.

Getting anything permitted in dual jurisdictions does not sound appealing.

Loading replies...