Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

19
Posts
1
Votes
Shahid Iqbal
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Plano, TX
1
Votes |
19
Posts

Considering filing for 'Specific Performance' - Seller backs away

Shahid Iqbal
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Plano, TX
Posted

Hi Pros,

I can use your guidance here.

I have scenario where buyer signed a contract to purchase a piece of land here in Texas held by a trust. Contract is using standard 'TREC Unimproved Property Contract' with seller responsible to provide survey and pay for title / commitment. There were two installments of earnest money that were both paid by the buyer on-time. As closing date  (originally May 2) approached, seller was not providing original trust that was required by title company to issue the title commitment. Before closing, survey was performed (paid by buyer; but seller is responsible for the cost) and it identified that there was encroachment by neighbor. Buyer raised the objection for boundary issue to be resolved a day before closing date; so per contract language, closing date gets extended for 14 days for seller to cure the objection. In first week of May, seller provided the title company original trust and agrees to extend the closing date to May 15. Even though there was objection on boundary issue, buyer is open to idea of closing on property as long as title commitment can be issued with exception. Title company responded that it's not able to get anyone to issue title commitment and returned the earnest money to buyer. So that is where things are now.

Buyer is still interested to close the property and asking seller to take contract to different title company and execute. Buyer has incurred about $5000 (survey and other due diligence related cost). Now seller is not cooperating or responding to any of buyer attempt and kind of walking away from the contract.

Buyer is considering to file for 'specific performance' so seller complies with contract. Is this a case that typically good chance for buyer to:

A. Force the sale of the property.    AND/OR

B. Force seller to pay for the monetary damages / expenses incurred by buyer and any related attorney charges for covering 'specific performance' case.

Many thanks.

Loading replies...