Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
9
Votes
Ram Ranga
  • Investor
  • Charlotte
9
Votes |
17
Posts

False representation - Closing an investment property

Ram Ranga
  • Investor
  • Charlotte
Posted

Hello All, we have found an ocean side property in SC, and closing the transaction tomorrow as our investment property. However, the real estate attorney just called us and informed that the Title shows the year built as 1962 Vs 1985, as listed in the MLS listing by the seller. This is a false representation by the seller/seller's agent.

I am in dilemma now as whether I should move forward with the sale or back out due to misrepresentation of information. Can RE Investors and experts weigh-in asap, please?  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

680
Posts
644
Votes
Dustin Allen
  • Real Estate Agent
  • South Lake Tahoe, CA
644
Votes |
680
Posts
Dustin Allen
  • Real Estate Agent
  • South Lake Tahoe, CA
Replied

@Ram Ranga

With the change in age, the home is subject to Federal Lead Paint disclosures. If they didn’t already provide those, you can insist on them providing those. In our state at least (CA), that would renew our right to cancel based on a seller disclosure.  At the very least, you should be given 10 days to investigate the potential presence of lead paint as required by Federal EPA rules.

  • Dustin Allen
  • Loading replies...