Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67aaf/67aaf5048959f72e0ea9ae726872b04bc414c50e" alt="Graham Mink's profile image"
Hold & Rent or Sell Now?
Hello,
I am on the fence on what to do with one of the properties I own.
I own a SFH that I used to live in and I currently rent it out. I am locked in to a 30 year fixed rate loan at 3.875%. The property cash flows about $200 a month, but this does not set anything aside for capital improvements. I totally renovated the house in 2008 so I don't expect to need any major repairs in the near future.
Part of me wants to hold onto the house since it is in great shape, and I have a great loan. Another part wants to sell it and take the $50k I would net out and use it to buy a 4+ unit property that will generate more cash flow.
What would you do?
Are there any benefits to owning SFH over MFH other than easier resale?
Anything else I should consider?
Thank you for your time!
Graham Mink
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a55de/a55de2e83576c15bc8af5b7d39c2edaaea82a2c9" alt="David Krulac's profile image"
easier than resale....lots of components to that, more buyers, not bought on cash flow, probably sell to O/O, less expenses, less appliances, I could go on.
If you don't do a Section 1031, uncle will take some of that $50K, if you're in the highest tax bracket that bite could be 44% just Fed no counting state.
One alternative would be to get a second mortgage if there is equity above the first that you can borrow. The 20% equity that they'll require you to keep in the property would be less than the tax bite.
Without knowing all the details, I'm lean to keep.