Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago,

User Stats

34
Posts
10
Votes
Ryan Brown
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
10
Votes |
34
Posts

Renegotiate Post Inspection (As is sale)

Ryan Brown
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I just went into contract on my first SFR and the contract stipulates as is. No sweat. Now comes my inspection. I asked my agent if I can use any issues that come up in the inspection to renegotiate the price. She said no and explained that my only option would be to back out and lose my earnest money.

My understanding was that “as is” means that the seller will not make repairs, BUT it does leave the deal open to renegotiation if anything turns up in the inspection that wasn’t previously disclosed.

Perhaps I’ve misunderstood the renegotiation post inspection idea? Maybe it’s something that’s done but isn’t the planned prescribed way? Maybe it’s bad form or a bit of a dick move among owner occupant but it’s done commonly among investors?

Any help/advice/guidance would be highly appreciated. Thanks BP community!

Loading replies...