grandfathered-in MHP questions

[Nora Santana]

hello, has anybody run into this scenario before: I am doing due diligence on a grandfathered-in MHP in a city that does not allow MHP anymore.  it's a MHP built in 1977.  I tried to ask the city zoning to see if there is any restriction with replacing the older MHs with newer models and to infill vacant lots, but did not receive any conclusive answer from them. My question is: is this MHP worth pursuing ..?  If it is, is there any 'security' letter I can get from the city to make sure they wouldn't cite the park with non-compliance in the future..?

thanks in advance for helping.

[Daniel Smithson]

@Rachel H. is spot on. They won't want to give a conclusive answer, but they will have it filed away somewhere regarding how many approved lots, water/sewer taps, etc that the park has in place. 

Remember that it's the lot that's grandfathered, not the home itself. The park is literally just a parking lot with long-term parking. Of course, if it's worth fighting the battle with them is up to you. If you do move forward, I would suggest getting in touch with a local municipal lawyer for their opinion as well. I'm not aware of any city that has won that battle against a park owner who has stood their ground. HUD may also get involved as well since the city is actively discriminating against low-income individuals.

Just make sure that you position yourself with the city as wanting to improve the property, bring in newer (more traditional looking) homes and improve the perception of the property. Going toe-to-toe with city inspectors and code enforcement is never a good idea.