Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

6
Posts
2
Votes
Nora Santana
  • Rental Property Investor
  • south Texas
2
Votes |
6
Posts

grandfathered-in MHP questions

Nora Santana
  • Rental Property Investor
  • south Texas
Posted

hello, has anybody run into this scenario before: I am doing due diligence on a grandfathered-in MHP in a city that does not allow MHP anymore.  it's a MHP built in 1977.  I tried to ask the city zoning to see if there is any restriction with replacing the older MHs with newer models and to infill vacant lots, but did not receive any conclusive answer from them. My question is: is this MHP worth pursuing ..?  If it is, is there any 'security' letter I can get from the city to make sure they wouldn't cite the park with non-compliance in the future..?

thanks in advance for helping.

Loading replies...