Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago,

User Stats

52
Posts
27
Votes
John Brinkos
  • Hampton Roads, VA
27
Votes |
52
Posts

MHP with all homes owned by two investors

John Brinkos
  • Hampton Roads, VA
Posted
Has anyone owned a MHP when all the homes are owned by two other investors as rentals? General info: 40 pads. 36 homes in place. 0 owned by park. 19 owned by investor A and 17 owned by investor B. Investors A and B deal with tenant issues, placement and MH repair and upkeep. MHP owner deals with park as he would if there were 36 home owners (water, general landscaping and infrastructure upkeep, taxes and insurance) I have not heard much discussion on this model and I am curious if there are negatives/positive to it. There are discussions about being cautious when an investor owns multiple homes in a park but 100% seems a bit different.

Loading replies...