Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6,056
Posts
6,995
Votes
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
6,995
Votes |
6,056
Posts

Reverted forum format update and associated thread removal

Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
Posted

First, kudos to BP for reverting from its recently released Forum format update.  The new format had many issues that were thoroughly covered in the thread on the update.

Two thumbs down for removing the thread that was critical of the new format.  Maybe it was removed because with the revert to the previous forum format, BP thought it was no longer relevant.  If this is the case, I do not agree.  There were many posts that pointed out features of the forum that they found valuable (many of which the new format did not provide).  

In addition, removing the thread provides the perception that BP may have removed it because of the criticism of the new format and maybe looking at it as a criticism of BP.  My own view is if there are never any issues that it typically is a result of a conservative approach that is likely not to result in the product improving.  I do not look at the poor forum update as implying BP has a significant issue.  They tried something and IMO it was not a good change.  I suspect BP was hoping their users liked the forum update and one way to find out is to try the update.

My first day skiing, I suspect I broke the record for most crashes ever on a ski slope.  My step-sister and her friend crashed a couple of times.  In one day (my second day on skis) I was literally skiing circles around them.  They were still on the bunny slope and I was going to the top of the mountain (doing the easier runs from the top of the mountain, but to make the top of the mountain on the second day was very good).  My step-sister stopped skiing within a year and was still a long way from being able to go to the top of the mountain.  The point is pushing the limits can result in greater growth than taking the conservative route and that there is nothing wrong with some minor setbacks.

  • Dan H.
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    11,802
    Posts
    13,783
    Votes
    Bruce Woodruff
    #2 All Forums Contributor
    • Contractor/Investor/Consultant
    • West Valley Phoenix
    13,783
    Votes |
    11,802
    Posts
    Bruce Woodruff
    #2 All Forums Contributor
    • Contractor/Investor/Consultant
    • West Valley Phoenix
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Dan H.:

    First, kudos to BP for reverting from its recently released Forum format update.  The new format had many issues that were thoroughly covered in the thread on the update.

    Two thumbs down for removing the thread that was critical of the new format.  Maybe it was removed because with the revert to the previous forum format, BP thought it was no longer relevant.  If this is the case, I do not agree.  There were many posts that pointed out features of the forum that they found valuable (many of which the new format did not provide).  

    Thank God it's back, I realize even more now how bad the new one was....

    I hope they (BP) at least kept the remarks we all made....some good points were made and a good checklist of positives could be developed therein....

    Now this is a great forum again....!

    Loading replies...