Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 3 years ago on .
Rental Calc: 'Profit if Sold' Discrepancy
Has anyone else noticed a discrepancy in the 'Profit if Sold' portion of the rental calculator depending on if you decide to rehab the house vs not?
I know the Profit if Sold formula to be:
Profit if Sold = ARV in current year - Sales Expenses - Loan Balance - Money put into the deal + Total Cashflow since the purchase
where Sales Expenses = ARV * Sales Cost Percentage
I find the above formula to work out great every time I run a scenario where a rehab is involved. (EX: Buy a $150k home, put $25k into repairs, and ARV is $200k).
However, this formula does not hold true when no repairs are involved. (EX: Buy a $200k home that appreciates 2% each year)
The formula that mirrors the same outputs the rental calc gives is:
Profit if Sold = Property Value - Loan Balance - Money put into deal + Total Cashflow since the purchase
Does anyone have any insight into this? Thanks in advance!