Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 15 years ago, 01/06/2010

User Stats

1,491
Posts
374
Votes
Jim Wineinger
  • Real Estate Investor
  • ten mile, TN
374
Votes |
1,491
Posts

Approved vendor list

Jim Wineinger
  • Real Estate Investor
  • ten mile, TN
Posted

I am suprised that no one took Josh up on his offer of making a suggestion and starting a topic for this on the open forum.

My post to his Blog was as follows and any and all comments (good or bad) are welcome.

The idea of the approved vendor list was not my idea, I just commented on it.

An approved vendor list would be good, but it would have to be combined with a good influence rating with no or very very few complaints to go from the "dealmaking" area of the forum to that "proven approved vendor" area. .......... This process could be by an announcement that XXX person is being considered as an approved vendor. All posts or replies to that thread should be monotored (or maybe seen by only administration personnel) before being released to be seen by everyone. This would protect against the occasional unfounded negativity, but I would leave in place the number of responses and views so everyone knows that there have been responses while we await the result of the "investigation".

Loading replies...