Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Contractors
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

53
Posts
8
Votes
Lora H.
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
8
Votes |
53
Posts

Tenant is demanding I test for asbestos - Denver, CO

Lora H.
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
Posted

Hi BP friends! I've got a tenant that is asking/demanding that I test for asbestos in my SFH rental. This home was built in 1951, I bought in 2012; no basement - it's on concrete slab. It was a fix and flip when I bought it and the only work I've done on the property was landscaping; no remodeling has happened since I've owned it and nothing in the house is "falling apart" or deteriorating. This is a really nice home, granite counters, newer appliances, newer kitchen, etc. I lived in it until the end of 2015 and now it's a rental. I have some new tenants and one of their dad's pulled a vent and is suspicious that the house may have asbestos. I checked my inspection report from 2012 and spoke to my inspector; he doesn't test for asbestos and educated me he had no concerns about asbestos with this house. However, my tenant is claiming they called CO Health Dept and was told (apparently) that the law requires this house be tested because it was built before 1981 and there was work done by other people on the house (in 2012). Is this true? I did some research online including our BP forums and found some folks that seem to have some experience with this here. I thought I would ask BPer's and call out @Bill S. since I noticed you mentioned having some experience at this as a realtor. Any help/comment is helpful. I would never put anyone, including a tenant at risk for anything - I want them to be happy and healthy. I want to comply with the law whatever that is. But from what I read it seems I would need to test if it's currently under remodel, disturbance or something is deteriorating.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,047
Posts
596
Votes
Travis Sperr
  • Lender
  • Denver, CO
596
Votes |
1,047
Posts
Travis Sperr
  • Lender
  • Denver, CO
Replied

Testing is only required if you are disturbing potential asbestos. Asbestos tests are relatively inexpensive depending on the extent, but they require materials in question are disrupted to test- chipping, walls, floors, etc. 

If I had a tenant giving me a hard time I would let them know that I will let them out of their lease with no penalty and return the deposit as long at the property is left in as good or better shape than when they moved in. I have a pretty small tolerance for tenants making ridiculous demands. Pretty quickly they will either be quiet or move out.

The more rentals and experience you have managing tenants the more cynical and less tolerant you become.

Good Luck!

Loading replies...