Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Contractors
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

218
Posts
103
Votes
Ravi P.
  • Investor
  • Schaumburg, IL
103
Votes |
218
Posts

GC margins?

Ravi P.
  • Investor
  • Schaumburg, IL
Posted

Sorry this is a repost.

We bid a renovation project to 3 GCs. I have only received 1 response so far. But the GC accidentally sent me a breakdown of his subs cost associated with the project with his mark up 45% plus a 5% kick back fee to the interior designers that referred him. So I am looking at a 50% mark up. I know the GC provides a service and deserves to be compensated for his services, so long as he earns it. But I am curious to see what is the typical GC mark up. My understanding is that most GCs get paid on a cost plus method similar to this one but I am shocked by the margin of the mark up. The other 2 GCs are independent of the interior designers.

Another issue, for another day, is the kick back fee to the designers. I paid them a reasonable flat fee for there services. The fact they are pushing their contractors makes me skeptical. I felt like they were pushy, but I assumed they wanted to work with people they know.  I now know the real reason. The fee they would have made on the kick back would have doubled their income on the project.Their kickback fee was never disclosed. And I paid them up front 

What I really want to know is what is a typical GC fee. The renovation project should cost about 100k.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

399
Posts
166
Votes
Emilio Ramirez
  • Contractor
  • Denver, CO
166
Votes |
399
Posts
Emilio Ramirez
  • Contractor
  • Denver, CO
Replied

No such thing as a typical GC markup. Ask a Contractor how much to charge and he'll tell you, "As much as I can get." A Bidding situation can bring the price down, but when the market puts contractors in demand, it is reflected in their pricing.  You may be paying market value for your work. The contractor may be able to find a sub who they can control to provide the same service and quality for below market value. If so, who is entitled to that savings. You, who asked them to bid, or them who has spent their career building networks with subs and finding guys who can do the work below market value. 

That being said. I prefer the Construction Management Delivery Method. In this situation, you hire a construction manager who acts as an agent on behalf of the Owner. Here's a brief description that I've put together describing this process.

Construction Management as a Stepping Stone to Collaboration

The CM delivery method serves to better align the Contractor’s Goals with those of the Owner.

1.Fixed Fee – no markups on change orders

2.Transparency – Open book bidding and accounting allows Owner complete access to project cost records.

3.Flexibility - Allows for multiple scopes to be bid and analyzed by the CM and Owner prior to committing resulting in huge flexibility on the project scope.

4.Collaboration – Owner can use the CM Agency as his “Right Hand Man” truly representing the Owner’s best interests.

5.Non-Adversarial – Because the CM is contracted on a fixed fee, there is no arguing over change orders. This results in the CM and Owner being able to maintain a professional, non-adversarial relationship.

6.No Middle Man – Agreements with Trade Contractors and Owner are direct. This limits the possibility of a GC not paying his subs. The Owner also knows exactly what he’s paying and to whom.

7.Savings – If the CM and Owner are able to bid the project for less than the budget, all savings stay with the Owner. 

I'm curious, what did the bid come in at?

Loading replies...