Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on .

User Stats

1,217
Posts
903
Votes
Chinmay J.
  • Investor
  • Northern, VA
903
Votes |
1,217
Posts

Is this a potential RESPA violation. or smart marketing.

Chinmay J.
  • Investor
  • Northern, VA
Posted

I was recently approached by a huge national lender (withholding name for privacy reasons.) to see f I would like to work with the leads that they provide me.  The only caveat is that I would have to split the commission 70-30 (in my favor of course). The referral fee (as they are calling it and not a kickback) doesn't go directly to the lender, but the parent company who owns the lending arm. Assuming they are not forcing any of their clients to work with me, and giving them only an option to work with me, is this still a RESPA/TILA violation?  If you take away the parent company, can the lender directly get a referral fee from the realtor for closing the deal, as long as proper disclosures were provided to the client, and no one is forcing anyone to use the other party.