Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

91
Posts
26
Votes
Dane Peterson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Sarasota, FL
26
Votes |
91
Posts

2 Appraisals on FHA when over 100% of original purchase price.WHY

Dane Peterson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Sarasota, FL
Posted

I'm still pretty green to real estate. Two years and counting and I love that every deal has it's own challenges or hurdles. Even the easiest of deals will have something.

Another new "policy" has just been explained to me by the lender, for the borrower, that the FHA requires a 2nd appraisal when the purchase price is over 100% of the seller's purchase price and within the 91-180day period... Also to go along with this, the FHA will not allow the buyer to pay for that 2nd appraisal (not that I would if I was the buyer).

Can anyone give me the reasoning for this? I understand the 90day seasoning rule in effect with the FHA on rehabs but what does the price have anything to do with it when there are plenty of comps, proof of paid rehab work & the 1st appraisal comes in to justify the price? We aren't overpriced if anything we are under.

I'm not complaining by any means. Plenty of profit in the deal that coming out of pocket either $250 (if buyer's agent will pay half) or $500 isn't that big a deal but it's the policy itself. If the FHA wants to implement this sort of policy then it should be on the lender or FHA to cover this. Also I'm always on the listing, selling or cash buyer side so I never deal with the appraisals besides to let the appraiser in the property but is $500 standard for appraisals right now? Seems a bit steep and i'm assuming this is a lender cost that's fluffed a bit.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied

It's the FHA anti-flipping rule. You don't have to agree with it or understand it, you just have to know it and work around it. The good news is that FHA isn't the only game in town game in town for folks that don't have 10% down, however.

This my solution: turn the FHA buyers into FNMA HomeReady buyers @ 97% or 95% LTV. A few local flippers (and listing agents that list flips) put my fliers for this out at open houses, and counter all FHA offers with "must get preapproved w/ Chris Mason for conventional financing" (unless of course the highest and best offer is already conventional, in which case this is unnecessary for sellers/listing agents and would serve no purpose).

FNMA does not do rock bottom FICO scores and marginal DTIs like FHA will, so of the 10 FHA offers you get, you may be reduced to 3 or 5 still qualified offers. But with 1 appraisal instead of 2, and conventional property standards rather than FHA, the odds of an appraisal issue just got cut by more than half - good news for the seller and agents. And if the buyer has decent credit, HomeReady is way better financing than FHA anyways, so no one is being done a disservice here - and good news for the homebuyer. FHA loans are often higher profit for lenders, which is why folks with solid credit get shoved into FHA when Conventional is a better fit -- the folks shoving well qualified borrowers into FHA for no reason are the folks doing the disservice. FHA is supposed to be a gov't backed "second chance" for folks with bruised credit (& for that purpose, it is indeed a great tool for the toolbox), not the default go-to for anyone putting less than 20% down on a SFR that it has become due to lender profitability.

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...