Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 3 months ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Eli Jerman
1
Votes |
5
Posts

Assume FHA mortgage owner occupancy requirement

Eli Jerman
Posted

So I have a slightly unique situation (At least I think it is) but I recently assumed an FHA mortgage. The mortgage started 2 years ago before I assumed it and obviously the seller met the owner-occupied requirement by living in it for a year. So, my question is that because I am not starting a new FHA, and continuing the one started 2 years ago, do I have to now live in it for a year as well? Or has that requirement already been met? I do plan on living in it for a year at least but I want to redo a large amount of the interior so it would be much easier if I did not actually have to be living in it yet. Thank you for any advice.

Loading replies...