Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 5 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
6
Votes
Eli Jerman
6
Votes |
7
Posts

Assume FHA mortgage owner occupancy requirement

Eli Jerman
Posted

So I have a slightly unique situation (At least I think it is) but I recently assumed an FHA mortgage. The mortgage started 2 years ago before I assumed it and obviously the seller met the owner-occupied requirement by living in it for a year. So, my question is that because I am not starting a new FHA, and continuing the one started 2 years ago, do I have to now live in it for a year as well? Or has that requirement already been met? I do plan on living in it for a year at least but I want to redo a large amount of the interior so it would be much easier if I did not actually have to be living in it yet. Thank you for any advice.

Loading replies...