Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Yehuda Richman
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Agent Intervening in For Sale By Owner

Yehuda Richman
Posted

Did the real estate agent violate any code of ethics or standards of practice under the following fact pattern:

Seller listed a property online as a for sale by owner.  Without the aid of a real estate agent: the Buyer saw the listing, arranged a viewing directly with the seller, and made an offer on the property directly to the seller. Subsequently, a real estate agent who knew the buyer drew up a contract for the buyer and listed herself as the buyer's agent on the contract. (Agent told buyer that she (the buyer) had nothing to lose by formally submitting the offer contract with a buyer's agent listed since the seller would be responsible to pay the commission to buyer's agent.)

Thank you for your input!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

138
Posts
174
Votes
Irene Nash
  • Realtor
174
Votes |
138
Posts
Irene Nash
  • Realtor
Replied

Typically the legal arrangement for the seller to pay the buyer's agent is contained in the listing agreement, which is the contract signed between the listing agent and the seller, and which does not exist here. 

If there is no listing agreement or any other arrangement by which the seller has agreed to pay a buyer's agent, there is no obligation that I know of for the seller to pay the buyer's agent. When I represent buyers on a FSBO I reach an agreement with the seller ahead of time that they will pay my commission out of their net proceeds and the buyer agent's fee is part of what's written into the offer - our MLS has a form for that. Sometimes that does not affect the contract price, however if it is appropriate based on market valuation to offer the seller list price then the buyers can increase the offer amount over list price by the amount of the commission so that the seller nets their original list price.

I hope this makes sense, and laws do vary by state, but here in WA the seller would not have to pay a commission based on the situation you described.

Whether or not the agent violated a code of ethics depends in part on how correct their advice to the buyer was, and whether or not they failed to adhere to any 'reasonable skill and care' requirement your state may or may not have, as we have in our Law of Buyer Agency. There's no benefit to the agent for them to write up a deal knowing the seller has no legal obligation to pay them, so the agent may just be misinformed and not understand there is a problem. And again, your state may have some kind of different regulations - but I don't see how a buyer's agent can force a seller to pay a commission just by writing up a contract, I'm pretty sure that is not a 'thing' anywhere.

Loading replies...