Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

287
Posts
144
Votes
Nate Monson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Albany, NY
144
Votes |
287
Posts

Assistant Payment Structure

Nate Monson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Albany, NY
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I am curious for those of us who have assistants...have you ever explored a per transaction payment system? My thoughts are this would be a way to scale up efficiency for an assistant rather than have them sit around with nothing to do on some days for $15-$20 an hour. As of now I only am really using my assistant for transaction based work so there would be no additional work that could possibly occur outside of a transaction fee. 

I am curious if other people have used this type of model. If so what did you charge per transaction? Did this become to expensive as you scaled? Is a highly motivated salaried worker the most optimal option? Let me know your thoughts!

Thanks!

Loading replies...