Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on .

User Stats

537
Posts
228
Votes
Neil Aggarwal
  • Lender
  • Richardson, TX
228
Votes |
537
Posts

Fill in executed date on TREC contract using Digital Ink?

Neil Aggarwal
  • Lender
  • Richardson, TX
Posted

Hey everyone:

I have been using Digital Ink to fill out the TREC contract, but I have noticed part of the process is broken.

I am supposed to fill in the Executed Date on Page 8 after the buyer(s) and seller(s) sign the contract, but there is no way to do that.  So, I can think of two solutions:

1. Fill in the Executed Date before I send the contract out for signature
2. Leave the Executed Date blank.

Option 1 has a problem.  One seller took forever to sign the contract so the date I filled out (Which starts the clock for the termination period and everthing else) was pretty far in the past.  That was not good.

Does Option 2 (Leaving it blank) result in a valid contract?

How have you all been handling this problem?

Thanks,
 Neil