Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago, 06/27/2017

User Stats

44
Posts
9
Votes
Marie Grabo
  • Branford, CT
9
Votes |
44
Posts

Should I be a buyer agent for mostly reo properties?

Marie Grabo
  • Branford, CT
Posted

Hi, I'm a new agent working for a large broker. I'm not getting any leads except a few rentals here and there. I am about to interview with a small broker who deals primarily with bank owned properties and is promising me all of his buyer leads. Should I make the switch? Someone told me it was a bad idea cause the commissions are low, and the banks take forever to accept offers...is that still true?thanks in advance for the advice

Loading replies...