Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Dylan J.
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Off Market deal etiquette - agent representation

Dylan J.
Posted

My family and I are wondering what exactly the etiquette is when working with an agent and trying to find an off market deal. Should I be reaching out to current owners to find out if they are willing to sell their property and get more information about the property? Or should I be sending them to my agent if I am interested for them to do that work for me? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,425
Posts
30,066
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,066
Votes |
17,425
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Mike Dymski:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Mike Dymski:
Quote from @Lydia S.:

A couple of options exist.  
If you have a Buyer Broker Agreement in place with your agent, it may include the language that says all inquiries go through the agent, as well as what amount of compensation is due to them with any purchase you make as their client. So if you have such an agreement, they should be one making the connection with the off market property owner, even if you find it or hear about it somehow. 

This is the kind of stuff that led to the NAR lawsuit.


How so exactly? I find no correlation between a buyer agency agreement and what the NAR lawsuits were about?

Rules to make it easier for a buyer to negotiate fees or use no agent at all.

When I was an SFR buyer, I used/worked with my agent for every deal (purchase and sale). She was the linchpin for my investing. We would walk properties and make offers on the spot. No contract needed, and she would be pleased if I found a property through another agent or on my own. I am huge supporter of agents and the industry (and there are areas for improvement).


 Well the Department of Justice literally wants every buyer to have a buyer agency agreement going forward if they are working with a Realtor. Once the settlement is approved a buyer won't be able to use a Realtor without a written agency agreement. 

That's why I was confused with your statement. Your read on the lawsuits is the opposite of what the government's read is. Required agency agreements will be the new norm going forward, not what caused the lawsuits.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
44 Reviews

Loading replies...