Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 11 months ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Milford, pa
4
Votes |
41
Posts

sellers broker/principal broker split

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Milford, pa
Posted

Hi all,

Question regarding arranging a split structure with a principal broker. So we agreed on a 65-35% arrangement. However, he says he represents hundreds of exclusive buyers. In which case, any listing or deal I would bring he would likely try to match up with one of these buyers. I guess you can say he's a sellers broker where his interests look out for the buyer?  He said he'd want half of that 65% split in addition to the 35% since he's got the buyer. Now I suppose he's right- its like we-co-broked. However, isn't it only fair that I should be allowed to market the property properly and receive 65%. I'm not trying to prevent him from making money as much money as he can, but something seems off with such an arrangement, that primarily results in him effectively keeping 67.5% on most deals. Maybe its this is common with off-market listings? Im not sure..

How can I better negotiate/ structure terms in this situation? Or what should I be asking for?

TIA

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

479
Posts
316
Votes
Steve Milford
  • Realtor
  • Vancouver, WA
316
Votes |
479
Posts
Steve Milford
  • Realtor
  • Vancouver, WA
Replied

Whatever you work out is what it is. Its all a worry for nothing in my opinion. Easier to see in dollars and cents. If the traditional model is used, hypothetically if gross commission for the whole transaction was $10,000 split evenly between listing and selling agent, each side would receive $5,000. Initial split means that he would receive $1,750, leaving $3,250 for you. Now if all the $10,000 commission goes to the same brokerage, he receives $6,750 (as principal and buyer's broker) with $3,250 remaining to you. In the end you made the same.

If he is NOT the Buyer's broker, then he is then he only receives the initial 35%. In the end, it doesn't matter because if another agent at another brokerage presented the offer, you would be splitting the gross commissions with them.  

You should still be able to market it as you see fit, appropriately. He may provide oversight as your brokerage would be providing dual-agency, but it is your duty to represent the seller as their fiduciary. If not, I would find a different brokerage. 

Loading replies...