Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
3
Votes
Tony Alvine
3
Votes |
7
Posts

Can you "house hack" a condo?

Tony Alvine
Posted

As I understand it, house hacking would traditionally mean living in one unit of a multi unit property for at least a year and that would allow you to rent out the remaining units and then the unit you would live in after you complete your year. This would get you better mortgage rates with potentially less money down. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. I'm wondering if I can do the same thing with a 2/3 bedroom condo. Living in one bedroom for a year and renting the other rooms out to tenants and then renting out all three the following year. I'm not sure if that's allowed or if lenders would say no to that. To be clear, I'm not interested in what they "like", only what wouldn't constitute mortgage fraud and I wouldn't give any info to them that I don't have to.

The second part of that is, could I have the home be my "residence", for mortgage purposes, if I didn't physically live in it most of the time? Sounds stupid, I know. I wouldn't rent that room out to anyone for the first year, I would have the bills in my name and pay them, and I may stay there every now and then (I'd have a bed and some clothes there). Would it be any different than if I really did move in and then spent my days traveling? Only reason I ask is that it would be much more inconvenient for me to be there all the time as opposed to where I am now (where I live for a cash month to month, no bills in my name). And before someone asks why I would want to stay where I am and pay rent instead of move in there and live for free or cheaper... it would add 1.5 hours each way to my commute on public transport whereas I currently drive 15 mins with barely any traffic. Losing 60 hours a month isn't worth it.

What would be enough to call the place my "residence" on paper. Unit in my name, bills in my name, and me not claiming another place as my primary residence would be enough right?

Loading replies...