Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
3
Votes
Tarrek El-Saadi
3
Votes |
9
Posts

Is there something that I'm missing?

Tarrek El-Saadi
Posted

I'm just dipping my toes into the real estate realm and want to purchase an investment property. I feel like I'm having a serious information gap with buy and hold strategies, especially turnkey. Purchasing these properties for $80,000, 20% down, makes the mortgage and tax payment to less than $400, but properties in these areas are renting for $800? I don't know if I'm missing something but that's a $400/mo return (minus any property management fees, vacancy expenses, and depreciation expenses). Then you can turn around and borrow another loan against the equity on the home you just bought and do it again. Is it really that simple or am I completely missing something? Again, brand new to this and just looking at properties on zillow, realtor, and turnkey agencies. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

40
Posts
55
Votes
Bradley Chapple
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern Colorado
55
Votes |
40
Posts
Bradley Chapple
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern Colorado
Replied

@Tarrek El-Saadi

A bank loaning up to 100% of the value of the home would (usually) be too risky. The lender has to take into account a potential drop in home values. This buffer is to provide a “Plan B” if you were to default on the loan and they needed to take possession of the property and sell it. If you were the one loaning your money, you’d probably do the same.

With that being said, I have heard of a couple of lenders who will offer HELOCs of 90 to 100% LTV on a primary residence, because they assume that you'll be less likely to default on a property you need to keep a roof over your own head.

Loading replies...