Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago,

User Stats

14
Posts
4
Votes
Cole Felske
  • Calgary, Alberta
4
Votes |
14
Posts

Canada FTHBI Plan? Less money down for shared equity?

Cole Felske
  • Calgary, Alberta
Posted

I'm curious if any Canadian investors used the First Time Home Buyers Incentive (FTHBI) plan for their first purchase. For those that don't know, in its simplest form the government contributes to your down payment for a shared equity in the property which must be paid back when you sell or after 25 years. Links below.

https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en...

https://www.placetocallhome.ca...

I am based out of Calgary Alberta, and honestly I don't see why this wouldn't be a good idea for a long term buy and hold investor. Admittedly I haven't done a complete rundown of the numbers, or made an extensive spreadsheet to analyze this yet. But I'm curious if getting into early ownership for the cashflow will outweigh the cost of having to pay the government back, and the opportunity cost of continuing to rent and saving up to achieve the 20% for a couple more years. 

Bear in mind you will have to pay mortgage insurance since you're technically contributing under 20%, and I'm not totally sure mortgage brokers will allow this on a rental property. 

Thoughts? 

Loading replies...