Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

136
Posts
101
Votes
Ahmad H.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York, NY
101
Votes |
136
Posts

What's a fair split for passive partner?

Ahmad H.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York, NY
Posted

Hi BP,
I have a passive investor interested in partnering with me on next deal. I buy distressed multi-family, rehab, and rent. I'll be finding the deal, managing the rehab, renting, and on going management. The latter part of renting and managing is standard 10% of monthly rents but what should be the compensation for finding the deal and managing the rehab?

1. 10% of deal value as compensation. Essentially, partner would put up 60% and I put up 40% of all funds, with LLC ownership split 50/50.

2. 5% of purchase price as acquisition fee. 10% of rehab cost.

3. ???

Feedback & suggestions are welcome. I would like to find an arrangement that works for different deal types, instead of customizing for each, to keep things simple.

Loading replies...