Starting Out
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 4 years ago,
Sell house or rent it out?
In 2011, I bought a house for my father to live in. He died last
month and I’m trying to decide if I should sell the house or rent
it. I have no real estate investment experience.
2 BR, 2 BA, single
story, 1500 sq ft in the San Francisco East Bay (Eastern Contra
Costa) in a nice, safe neighborhood.
There’s no
mortgage. It needs $20,000 in cosmetic repairs.
If I sell …
Paid = $250,000 in
2011
Current value = $485,000 (this is once repairs are done – paint, flooring, windows, etc.)
Net proceeds to me =
$ 385,000. ($485,000 – 5% commission - closing costs – repairs -
taxes on capital gain = $485,000 - $24,250 - $3,000 - $20,000 –
$52,750)
If I rent it out…
For cost, I’m
presuming I hypothetically just sold the house and now, looking at
the house as a new purchase, it costs me my proceeds of $385,000 plus
the $20,000 I need to make in repairs.
Cost = $405,000
Anticipated rent =
$2,500/month = $30,000 per year.
Annual expenses are
52% gross rent (including property manager):
Net Income = $30,000
- $15,600 = $14,400
Cap Rate = 3.56%
2% expected
appreciation = $405,000 x 2% = $8,100
Total return =
($14,400 + $8,100) / $405,000 = 5.56%
How does this
compare to other Northern California real estate deals? If I take the
sale and put the $385k in a stock mutual fund, the return seems like
it would be equivalent. Diversification would be a pro for renting
it; more work and liability the con.
I’m kind of on the
fence.
Am I missing
anything? Is there anything else I should be thinking about?
Any opinions? Thank you so much
for your advice!