Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
7
Votes |
19
Posts

Is a 50 year old property too old?

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I've seen the rule of thumb that you shouldn't buy a property older than 30 years for value-add multi families. In some markets (like Cincinnati) the up-and-coming areas consist of properties that can be much older; between 50-100 years old. Also, for my budget I'm finding that most of my opportunities are between 50-75 years old. Mind you, I'm just searching MLS sites.

If a property is in solid shape and needs mostly cosmetic or other basic improvements but was built in, say, the 1950's, is the age a deal breaker?

Am I seeing mostly older properties because the younger properties are mostly off market?

Loading replies...