Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
7
Votes |
19
Posts

Is a 50 year old property too old?

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I've seen the rule of thumb that you shouldn't buy a property older than 30 years for value-add multi families. In some markets (like Cincinnati) the up-and-coming areas consist of properties that can be much older; between 50-100 years old. Also, for my budget I'm finding that most of my opportunities are between 50-75 years old. Mind you, I'm just searching MLS sites.

If a property is in solid shape and needs mostly cosmetic or other basic improvements but was built in, say, the 1950's, is the age a deal breaker?

Am I seeing mostly older properties because the younger properties are mostly off market?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

299
Posts
299
Votes
Mack Benson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Woodbury, MN
299
Votes |
299
Posts
Mack Benson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Woodbury, MN
Replied

Age isn't the end all be all but it is something to consider. Minneapolis and St. Paul have a number of solid brownstones built in the late 1800s through the mid 1900s and many of them have gone through extensive rehabs over the years. If you are looking pre 1960s you will likely want to perform a more thorough physical due diligence paying close attention to the electrical and plumbing. While looking at the plumbing I think you should get the sewer lines scoped so you know if there is any existing damage or failures.

I'm not familiar with your market but in mine you won't find much on the MLS. Just about anything over about 7 units is going to be listed by a multifamily broker and only available through their website or an e-mail from the listing broker.

  • Mack Benson
  • Loading replies...