Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

603
Posts
130
Votes
Adam Craig
  • Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
130
Votes |
603
Posts

Best way to inspect potential properties.

Adam Craig
  • Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
Posted

I am getting ready to make my first investment purchase. I came up with a list of 6 properties that will produce what I consider adequate cash flow. I dont have anything on my list that needs major rehab work (that I know of) - only things like carpet/drywall/paint/cosmetic issues. My goal is to keep rehab costs under 8K ball park - if it needs more then that I dont want to bother.

With limited rehab knowledge - what is the best way to go about inspecting these properties. I have a good home inspector that I used a couple times that only charges $250. Should I be using a home inspector or should I bring a contractor with me....or both?

What is the best way to narrow this list down without having 8 home inspections done.

Thanks!

Loading replies...