Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago,

User Stats

14
Posts
3
Votes
Connor Streit
  • Kearney, NE
3
Votes |
14
Posts

1% Rule Analysis Paralysis

Connor Streit
  • Kearney, NE
Posted

Hello BP Community,

Anytime I am analyzing a potential investment property, the 1% rule lingers in the back of my mind and makes me hesitant about pulling the trigger on a deal. My main barrier is:

1) Lack of Cash-flow - I live in a market where rental rates and home prices are on opposite sides of the spectrum. I.e. On average, 3bed/2bath houses go for about 150k with the average rental rate hovering around 1k/month for updated houses. Do I need to switch up my strategy to make a deal work? I'm wanting to BRRRR my first property but hesitate to pull the trigger because, after all expenses are accounted for, I'm still having to shell out $400-$600/month to pay the mortgage.


Am I missing an important element in my analysis? Is there another way to analyze a property without making the 1% rule a priority? Appreciate any insight!

Loading replies...