Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
3
Votes
Sheri Prather
  • New York, NY
3
Votes |
5
Posts

How to start to invest - long distance (Chicago) vs onsite (NJ)

Sheri Prather
  • New York, NY
Posted

Hello everyone!

I am fairly new to the real estate scene and have been silently educating myself through BP's forums, webinars, my own reading, podcasts, etc. I say fairly new because I own property in Chicago, currently rented, as I have recently moved to NYC. My long term goal for real estate is to buy multiple multi unit buildings so I can become a FT REI / landlord.

I have been ansty to start making moves towards my next investment. I'm thinking a 3-4 multi unit will be my sweet spot to start. However, I am torn on where to buy, Chicago or NJ. I say NJ as I cannot afford anything in the city of NYC and I have family in NJ that can help me manage the property for emergencies, large issues, etc who live in NJ. Do I stick with the area that I know and is more affordable or is the value of being on-site worth more?

I know Chicago neighborhoods, have a much better understanding of the market, have a network, and my current property is there. On the flip side, I live in NYC. I am learning the NY/NJ real estate markets, neighborhoods, and will be creating a network from scratch. I thoroughly enjoy being an active participant in maintaining my property and I learn best by doing the work. Real estate in the city of Chicago is more affordable than anything in the suburbs of NJ. However, a solid PM would be the key to this working in Chicago. Though no one will care about your property as much as you do.

What is the forum's experience with buying long distance rentals, especially for first time multi unit owners? Does living nearby hold more value than having a great PM?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5
Posts
3
Votes
Sheri Prather
  • New York, NY
3
Votes |
5
Posts
Sheri Prather
  • New York, NY
Replied

Hi @Crystal Smith, I hear you on that. Being open to both areas may give me my answer naturally. You mentioned you started local and then branched out. Did you find that starting local was a good way to find your ground and work through new investor dilemmas? Or would your first experience have been the same regardless of where you started?

Hi @Kevin P., I understand your perspective. Those are the some of the things I was also thinking by staying close to home. I do agree, people tend to work harder when they have someone regularly checking in on them who's truly invested.

Hi @Mark Allen Kenny, thank you for the offer! I will take you up on that as I would like to start gradually building my network while I figure out the best location for my next investment. What made Philadelphia the best place to start with compared to other cities? Was it the specific to staying within the overall East Coast area?

Loading replies...